Category: Organizational Engineering

  • Failing Up

    Failing Up

    Any project, business, or action might fail. This is true regardless of how prepared you are, how skilled the people executing that idea are, or how hot the market for certain goods or services might be. Failing seems bad, and the connotation of that word drives us to avoid it at any cost.

    Failure, however, is one of the things we will certainly face during our lifetime -all of us! From the small failures of dying during a boss fight in a video game or getting rejected when asking for a date, until the big ones that cost us a lot of money and time.

    Despite the fact that it’s inevitable, we shouldn’t leave the success of our project or actions to pure luck -and that’s when bracing and understanding failures can help us. When we simply avoid failure, we might be losing the opportunity to learn from it; therefore, the chance to not fail again.

    Embracing failure is not only important, but EXTREMELY valuable for both human beings and organizations: we learn to walk as babies after falling down many times, we learn how to multiply two numbers after getting the wrong answer a number of times, we learn how to publish an app after finding and correcting a thousand bugs, and we learn how execute projects after failing to plan and deliver several others.

    The cognitive psychologist Gary Klein was interviewed about the theme and introduced the concept of a “pre-mortem” exercise, which involves analyzing any given project before “the patient dies.” He invites teams and companies to consider they are in the future and that the project failed: why did the project fail, and what could have been done to prevent it?

    As discussed in a different episode of the Freakonomics podcast, people tend to be optimistic about projects that are starting, which is also why New Year’s resolutions will usually boost people’s morale. Being optimistic, team members will forecast that the project will be a success and might disregard risks, even those occurring in front of them.

    That’s why Klein’s exercise drives people to think in the opposite direction: our project went wrong -what now?

    Admitting mistakes -besides, of course, working to fix them- is extremely healthy for any organization and the first step towards improvement. Truthful diagnostics always start by listing mistakes and issues, and companies seeking improvement must be highly self-critical and admit errors.

    What are clients saying? Could they be happier?

    Why did our last projects fail (or, at least, derail)?

    Why did we lose some of our better team members?

    Could we be selling more?

    Growth comes only from tackling the right areas, and an accurate diagnosis is vital to unlocking the potential of any organization.

    Do you want to map out and fix issues in your business in Oxford County, or any other part of Southern Ontario? Talk to us!

  • Organizational Ambidexterity

    In your personal life, there are moments when you might lose focus because your eyes are on something else. We don’t have the hands or parallel-processing power to have much on your plates. That’s why many specialists argue that people can’t really “multi-task.” And, yes, using a cell phone will impair your driving ability.


    When we talk about organizations, something similar happens -especially when we talk about small or medium-sized ones. At present, any organization needs to service its clients and fulfill all its promises; this is the basic requirement for keeping any balance sheet balanced. However, another thing that companies need to keep an eye on is the future. Changes need to be made, processes need to be improved and/or redesigned, people need to be hired, new products (services or goods) need to be planned, etc. How can I aim at the future when all my resources are allocated to deliver our current promises and make the company survive?

    Just like humans, organizations can’t focus on too many things simultaneously. Resources are limited, and I can’t compromise my survival today by thinking about a future that may never come, right? Similarly, how can I anticipate tendencies or be ready to overcome competition in the future if I’m not planning for that?

    This problem is extremely common in organizations of all sizes, even when those companies are not paying attention. At any moment, companies usually pay attention to one of those two focuses -the present or the future- while the other is relegated to when “something happens.” And if lines such as “Ah, crap, that client’s delivery will be late” or “Hm, we were not anticipating that turn in the market” are common occurrences in your organization, I might be talking about you.

    A company’s ability to pay due attention (and deliver) in the present while also considering and preparing for the future is known as “organizational ambidexterity,” and, just like any ability, it can be developed.

    Most companies’ leadership teams will be primarily busy firefighting or fixing issues and putting order into chaos. This will take most of their time and prevent them from focusing on other activities, such as watching market tendencies, developing team members, or reviewing workflows. Therefore, those companies are underprepared (or unprepared at all) once the future arrives, and the infinite cycle of “solving today’s issues and focusing on the future later” never ends. Those organizations are used to that.

    Parallely, companies that spend their time and resources thinking about new products, new markets, and what might come might end up losing track of the present, not producing or delivering what needs to be delivered now. This will make them lose clients or never have them to begin with. Thinking about these situations, it’s clearly imperative that those organizations’ leaders need to adequate how they manage and run their businesses in order to survive and thrive.


    Acquiring “organizational ambidexterity,” despite not being impossible, is a project that demands attention, energy, and intention. This process will usually start with a complete overhaul of the current operations: Which team members are allocated to which task? How is each workflow designed, and are they being executed as expected? What are the current issues that clients and employees are facing? What are our current performance metrics, and how are we doing in them? And, finally, are we delivering what our strategic plans describe (by the way, do we have strategic planning?)?


    By digging deep into the organization’s current state, enough input should be available to list -and later execute- what needs to be fixed for the present to run satisfactorily. If properly implemented, these fixes should give an appropriate pattern for the current operations, let the manager focus solely on odd cases that escape the planned flows, and free up time for the management team to consider future plans and improvements.


    Now, thinking about the future can and should not be a random exercise of imagining how the next months or years can be. Similarly to how we seek to bring order to the organization’s present, planning what’s to come needs a pattern and order. Specific research and development processes must be in place, information sources must be listed, and a specific strategic plan should be defined. Additionally, are we using specific tools? What resources are available to change/innovate? Who will be responsible for each step or stage? Do we want to optimize and change what we currently have, or do we aim to create new things?

    Little will be accomplished if we just transfer the current chaos to the tasks related to the future steps.

    So, in summary, the organization needs to seek standards. The present should follow guides, and the future must be pursued orderly. This doesn’t mean that things should be rigid, mainly because that would likely kill innovation initiatives, but even creativity can be aided by some well-built patterns. Plenty of innovation tools can help with creation and innovation in any organization while keeping the current workflows organized.


    Making an organization ambidextrous is not an easy task, but one of the most reliable ways to make it “future-proof.”

    Do you want to learn how to optimize your business in Oxford County, or any other part of Southern Ontario? Talk to us!